Breaking News

Senate Non-Binding Resolution for Greater Role in Tariffs

Granted, this site and much of the work that I do, has come about due to America’s general ignorance about our Constitution.  However, sometimes the level of ignorance, especially from those who have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution, just takes my breath away!

Senate Non-Binding Resolution for Greater Role in Tariffs.

Recently I’ve been reading and hearing about what is described as “a Senate vote for a greater role in tariffs”, “an overwhelming rebuke of [President] Trump over tariffs”, and even the Senate “pushing back on Trump”.  While the enthusiasm for what is an effectively meaningless vote is annoying, what I find truly breathtaking is the fecklessness of a congressional body that has to have a non-binding resolution to ask a conference committee to include language in a bill to give Congress a power it already has!

SENATORS INTRODUCE LEGISLATION TO REQUIRE CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF NATIONAL SECURITY-DESIGNATED TARIFFS

So several Senators want to pass legislation to require Congress to approve tariffs.  How about using the U.S. Constitution?

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,

U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 8, Paragraph 1

The very first power granted to Congress is the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts. and excises.  But wait, you ask, is there anything in the Constitution about tariffs?

Definition of tariff
1 a : a schedule of duties imposed by a government on imported or in some countries exported goods

Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Since a tariff is simply a schedule or list of duties to be imposed, it is Congress, not the President, who has the power to impose them and collect them.  There is no exception for “national security” or any other reason.

And what is the response to this violation of separation of powers and blatant infringement on the role of Congress?  The Senate passes a non-binding resolution asking their members of a conference committee (a group from both the House and the Senate, who work out differences between legislation passed in both houses) to include language to give them the power that the Constitution has already given them.

It is possible that Congress had passed a law allowing the President to impose certain tariffs without approval from them, but then it would be their fault for passing an unconstitutional law in the first place.  All they would have to do is pass legislation rescinding the law giving the President this unconstitutional power.  If Congress truly wanted to use their power to approve these new tariffs, all they would have to do is pass legislation prohibiting any appropriated funds from being used to enforce any of these illegal tariffs.  If the President vetos the legislation, simply override it.  If the Senate can pass a non-binding resolution 88-11, do you think they could get 67 Senators to stand up for their authority?  Is it too much to ask Congress to uphold their oaths of office and follow the Constitution?

My Conclusion

Ignore the hype, both from the media and from the politicians.  This is a move of a neutered institution, a phony act of bravado that tries to make them look more powerful than they are.  The sad part is Congress does have the power to control tariffs, they are just unwilling to use it.  Remember that the next time you choose your elected representatives.  Maybe if we held them to a higher standard, they would do their jobs rather than stomping around trying to get attention for doing nothing.

Paul Engel

Like many of you, I am a product of the public schools. Like many of you I thought the Constitution was for lawyers and judges. One day I read the Constitution, and was surprised to find I didn't need a law degree to understand it. Then I read the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist Papers and even the Anti-Federalist Papers. As I learned more and more about our founding fathers and documents I saw how little we know about how our country was designed to work and how many people just didn't care. I started The Constitution Study to help those who also want read and study our Constitution.