The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Judges wield significant power, often in ways that challenge constitutional boundaries. Alexander Hamilton noted their intended limitations in Federalist #78, yet modern judges frequently shape laws based on personal beliefs. This piece explores the implications of such judicial actions on our rights and questions how unelected officials can make crucial decisions in a democratic society.
Read MoreJustices said experts can testify about ‘most people’ in a group to which a defendant belongs.
Read MoreProfessor Carl Moody, our CPRC research director, and Dr. John Lott have new research available for download. Abstract In response to our short paper in Academia Letters, Bondy et. al. published much longer response in this journal. We show that the Bondy et. al. criticisms are misleading and irrelevant. We present new estimates of the […]
Read More‘North Carolinians want consistency, transparency, reliability, and accuracy in election administration,’ Jim Womack told The Federalist.
Read MoreWe have heard repeatedly during this election cycle that Donald Trump is a deep and abiding threat to democracy. That threat supposedly springs from Trump’s… Read More
The post The Democratic Subversion of Democracy appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Read MoreSen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) proposed a $60,000 annual national minimum wage for teachers, sending the message that if you pay them, the results will come. None of the legislators or witnesses who spoke at the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing on June 20 disputed the assertion that increased pay is a solution […]
Read More‘Access reproductive health care’
Read MoreCopyright © 2017-2024 | Powered by WordPress | Theme by TheBootstrapThemes