Month: March 2025

Federal Judge Denies Trump’s Effort to Ban Transgender People From Military

The judge previously ruled that the ban likely violates constitutional rights to equal protection.

Whistleblower Alleges FDA Approved Medical Product Despite Experts’ Concerns

An employee of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research says the agency rushed a first-of-its kind medical product to market prematurely.

Homeland Security Secretary Confirms Plans to Eliminate FEMA

Trump has signaled that he wants to either eliminate or overhaul the agency.

Supreme Court Decision in VanDerStok Case: Pluses and Minuses

A copy of the Supreme Court’s decision in the VanDerStok case is available here. This case was more of a regulatory issue than a Constitutional question. This is not a Second Amendment case. The decision contains some positive news as well as some negative news. On the positive side, the court did not accept the […]

Signed as Law: Utah Bans Warrantless Reverse-Keyword Search Surveillance

This is another advance in Utah’s step-by-step approach to protect privacy and limit the surveillance state. In 2023, Utah enacted a law banning warrantless geofence location tracking, Rep. Ryan Wilcox and Sen. Todd Weiler filed House Bill 273 (HB273) to add any search for "reverse keyword information" to that warrant requirement.

The post Signed as Law: Utah Bans Warrantless Reverse-Keyword Search Surveillance first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.

The Second Amendment Is Not Subject to Judicial Repeal: A Response to the Supreme Court’s Betrayal

In a stunning 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the Biden administration’s authoritarian attempt to regulate so-called ghost guns. …

The post The Second Amendment Is Not Subject to Judicial Repeal: A Response to the Supreme Court’s Betrayal appeared first on The New American.

Justice Thomas Slams SCOTUS Majority For Backing Biden’s Ghost Gun ‘Overreach’

‘Permits ATF to regulate’

Supreme Court Upholds Biden-Era ‘Ghost Gun’ Regulation

The regulation had been challenged as a misinterpretation of federal law.