Breaking News

Month: January 2026

506 – Copyright Shakedown

Copyrights and patents are important protections for inventors, authors, and all sorts of creators. In the case Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, I’m reminded of the response Willie Sutton gave when asked why he robbed banks. “Because that’s where the money is.” Because this case seems more like a copyright shakedown than the protection of copyrights.

Read More

Is America spiraling toward self-destruction?

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Many Americans sense the nation is unraveling as leaders bypass the law, courts overreach, debt explodes, and trust in institutions erodes. From unchecked executive power to flawed artificial intelligence, the country drifts toward chaos unless citizens reclaim responsibility, courage, and the will to live free again…

Read More

The fraud in California is absolutely wild…

https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/2012684148545053022

Read More

NYC Socialists Assembling Army of 4,000 Anti-ICE Activists to Bring Minnesota Mayhem to Big Apple

https://bonginoreport.com/top-stories/nyc-socialists-assembling-army-of-4000-anti-ice-activists-to-bring-minnesota-mayhem-to-big-apple

Read More

Federal Judge Bars LAPD Use of “Less-Lethal” Weapons on Protesters

https://bonginoreport.com/swamp-watch/federal-judge-bars-lapd-use-of-less-lethal-weapons-on-protesters

Read More

Why are so many people surprised when politicians’ promises fail?

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Governor Hochul of New York is promising to make child care cheaper by taking the money from you to subsidize the child care of others. Then there’s Trump. He wants to ban institutional investment in single-family homes. Not only is that not constitutional, but based on the size of said institutional investment, it would probably raise prices, not lower…

Read More

Unanswered questions and missing evidence in Minneapolis shooting

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Why did the agents get out of their car to approach the woman? Why did they have their sidearms drawn, an obvious threat? Why did they believe she was armed and dangerous? And what responsibility did the agent who was impacted by the car have, since he appears to have been walking in front of a moving vehicle?

Read More