Author: Paul Engel
Like many of you, I am a product of the public schools. Like many of you I thought the Constitution was for lawyers and judges. One day I read the Constitution, and was surprised to find I didn't need a law degree to understand it. Then I read the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist Papers and even the Anti-Federalist Papers. As I learned more and more about our founding fathers and documents I saw how little we know about how our country was designed to work and how many people just didn't care. I started The Constitution Study to help those who also want read and study our Constitution.
488 – Wisconsin Religious Definition
Back in March, the Supreme Court argued the case Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., et al. v. Wisconsin Labor And Industry Review Commission et al. I reviewed those arguments in my article 472 – Are You Religious Enough? In June, the court released its decision, and thankfully, the court came to what I believe is the correct decision. That’s not to say they came to the conclusion for the right reasons.
Read More
487 – State Sovereignty
Which came first, the states or the federal government? A better question should be who created whom? Did the federal government create the states? No, the states created the federal government when they ratified the Constitution. So if the states are the “parents” of the federal government, why are they not sovereign over it? One state legislature tried to pass legislation to reassert their position as sovereign over the federal government. Sadly, that measure did not pass… yet.
Read More
486 – A Twisted Case Leads to a Twisted Decision
There is a quote that pretty much sums up a recent Supreme Court decision regarding your health insurance. Oh what a tangled web we weave When first we practice to deceive Sir Walter Scott In the case Kennedy v Braidwood Management, inc., we see the tangled web the United States has woven when it practiced…
Read More
485 – One Small Win for Parents’ Rights
Earlier this year I wrote about the oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the case Mahmoud V. Taylor. The case had to do with a parent’s right to opt their children out of content in public school they found objectionable, and the Supreme Court was asked if the plaintiffs were entitled to a preliminary injunction preventing the school from teaching their children objectionable content until the court had decided the case. On June 27, 2025, the court published its decision.
Read More
484 – Gender Wars: Battle of Tennessee
All of western culture is at war. The fundamental point of conflict is whether a person’s “gender” is determined by biology or psychology, reality or wishes. One of the latest battles in this war is the Supreme Court case United States v. Skrmetti. In this case Mr. Skrmetti, as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, is defending the state’s law that prohibits the use of so-called “gender-affirming” care for minors. The answer the court came to will surprise some and infuriate others.
Read More
Officer Helsley of the Clarksburg Police Punched A Guy Repeatedly in the Face
Yesterday, during an arrest, Officer Helsley of the Clarksburg, WV police decided to slam an already detained person’s head into a curb and then punch the suspect repeatedly in the face. For some reason, most of the reporting on this situation leaves out the officer’s name. His name is Elijah Helsley, and he’s a police…
Read More
483 – Universal Injunctions Decided
In the “Rock, Paper, Scissors” of our federal government, who wins? Does a federal court always get what it wants, or are there limitations? While hearing cases on the question of “birthright citizenship”, several District Courts claimed the power to rule over the President. I don’t remember seeing that in the Constitution. Now, the Supreme Court has weighed in, deciding in the case Trump v. Casa that lower courts are not all powerful after all.
Read More
482 – Due Process Amendments
There has been a lot of talk about due process lately, but little of it seems to be informed by proof or evidence. Five of the ten amendments in the Bill of Rights are called the “Due Process Amendments”. With a little bit of research, we can not only be sure of what due process is, but how the Constitution protects our rights to it.