Podcast
539 – Does Money Equal Speech?
People frequently complain about money in politics. Others complain that campaign finance rules suppress “free speech”. Which brings up the question in the Supreme Court case NRSC v. FEC.
Read More
538 – Determining What Your Home is Worth
No one likes to pay taxes. Some go so far as to claim you don’t own your home since it can be taken for failure to pay taxes. If you how a tax debt, how should government determine the value of your property?
Read More
537 – Keeping Girls Safe
Should those with a mental illness be allowed to scare and stalk our wives and daughters in pursuit of their disease? Can public schools protect our young ladies, or shall mental illness supersede the law, biology, and common sense?
Read More
536 – Defining Election Day
When is Election Day? Is it defined as the day the ballots are marked by citizens or received by election officials. That is the heart of the question in the case Watson v. RNC, and the court’s decision will impact more than just Mississippi.
Read More
535 – Hawaii’s Attack on Property Rights
Who decides who can carry a firearm on your property and under what conditions? Does the Second Amendment presume permission or restriction? According to the Hawaiian legislature, they decide who carries and presumes restriction.
Read More
534 – Geofence Warrants
We all walk around with tracking devices on, cellphones. While these devices report our location on an almost second by second basis, what are the rules law enforcement has to follow to search that data?
Read More
533 – EPA vs State’s Rights
I’ve heard a lot of people talking about the Monsanto case and the claims that one of their products, Roundup, may cause cancer. However, the case before the Supreme Court was much more unique, involving state’s rights, intrastate commerce, and the limits of federal law and regulation.
Read More
532 – Birthright Citizenship at SCOTUS
In one of the most anticipated opinions of this Supreme Court Term, Trump v. Barbara questions whether an Executive Order with language that mirrors the Constitution is actually constitutional. I believe this history will remember this opinion as one of the dumbest of any Supreme Court in history.